FEMA Web Page Shows Martial Law Exercise With Foreign Troops

Set for July 2009...Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country

http://www.fema.gov/media/fact_sheets/nle09.shtm

The above is a link to FEMA.GOV website page that details the upcoming nationwide training exercise in July 2009. This is directly cut and pasted the full text below from the site.

This is very alarming. This IS NOT an exercise for FEMA to practice disaster relief. This page states very clearly that this exercise will "focus exclusively on terrorism prevention and protection, as opposed to incident response and recovery".

Remind Local Police of Their Oath before FEMA Martial Law Exercise 

http://targetfreedom.typepad.com/targetfreedom/2009/07/remind-local-police-of-their-oath-.html

Go to their web pages and get their contact information.

Send emails, faxes, and make phone calls.

Contact law enforcement at all levels.

Contact county officials, national guard, and the Attorney General of your state.

 

Defending the Constitution against all enemies foreign and DOMESTIC:

We ask local representatives and police to protect our civil liberties.

Our county sheriff's and state police have the obligation, and the duty, to uphold the oath that they have sworn.

AND THEY ARE BRINGING FOREIGN TROOPS INTO OUR TOWNS AND CITIES TO TRAIN TO POLICE US. As stated in FEMA website,

"This year the United States welcomes the participation of Australia, Canada, Mexico and the United Kingdom in NLE 09." 

 

Imagine, armed Mexican troops protecting us from "terrorism" in the United States!  Don't you feel safer already? ¿Dónde están sus documentos?

 

Rumors of foreign troops on our soil have been circulated for a long time. BUT this is not a rumor. It is a blatant fact as stated by FEMA on their government website. THIS IS AN INVASION.

During Katrina the federal government went in and disarmed everyone, even law abiding citizens. Recently, Tennessee passed into law a bill that states that Tennessee residents undoubtedly have the right to keep and possess their firearms during martial rule. Why did they feel the need to do this? And what does it mean when our government is running martial law drills on a nationwide scale?

 

We are told that this is just a training exercise. Should we believe that?

Is this a venue for a REAL imposition of martial law?

Who is being trained? Are the American PEOPLE being trained to accept martial law? Let them know that we failed this training!

Foreign troops in the Southwest sounds incredibly similar to what we learned, back in the 1980's, from undercover FBI agent  Larry Grathwohl:

 

Watch the videos that are here:

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/election/480

 

http://targetfreedom.typepad.com/targetfreedom/2009/04/plot-to-kill-capitalists.html

 

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/5742

 

Undercover FBI agent Larry Grathwohl told us of people whom he described in this way:

 

"They felt that this counter-revolution could best be guarded against by creating and establishing re-education centers in the Southwest, where we would take all of the people who needed to be re-educated into the new way of thinking and teach them how things were going to be. I asked, well what is going to happen to those people that we can't re-educate that are die-hard capitalists? The reply was that they would have to be eliminated. When I pursued this further they estimated that they would have to eliminate 25 million people in these re-education centers. When I say eliminate, I mean kill … 25 million people.

I want you to imagine sitting in a room with 25 people, most of which have graduate degrees from Columbia and other well-known educational centers, and hear them figuring out the logistics for the elimination of 25 million people. And they were dead serious."

http://www.fema.gov/media/fact_sheets/nle09.shtm

National Level Exercise 2009 (NLE 09)

National Level Exercise 2009 (NLE 09) is scheduled for July 27 through July 31, 2009. NLE 09 will be the first major exercise conducted by the United States government that will focus exclusively on terrorism prevention and protection, as opposed to incident response and recovery.

NLE 09 is designated as a Tier I National Level Exercise. Tier I exercises (formerly known as the Top Officials exercise series or TOPOFF) are conducted annually in accordance with the National Exercise Program (NEP), which serves as the nation's overarching exercise program for planning, organizing, conducting and evaluating national level exercises. The NEP was established to provide the U.S. government, at all levels, exercise opportunities to prepare for catastrophic crises ranging from terrorism to natural disasters.

NLE 09 is a White House directed, Congressionally- mandated exercise that includes the participation of all appropriate federal department and agency senior officials, their deputies, staff and key operational elements.  In addition, broad regional participation of state, tribal, local, and private sector is anticipated. This year the United States welcomes the participation of Australia, Canada, Mexico and the United Kingdom in NLE 09. 

EXERCISE FOCUS

NLE 09 will focus on intelligence and information sharing among intelligence and law enforcement communities, and between international, federal, regional, state, tribal, local and private sector participants.

The NLE 09 scenario will begin in the aftermath of a notional terrorist event outside of the United States, and exercise play will center on preventing subsequent efforts by the terrorists to enter the United States and carry out additional attacks. This scenario enables participating senior officials to focus on issues related to preventing terrorist events domestically and protecting U.S. critical infrastructure.

NLE 09 will allow terrorism prevention efforts to proceed to a logical end (successful or not), with no requirement for response or recovery activities. 

NLE 09 will be an operations-based exercise to include: activities taking place at command posts, emergency operation centers, intelligence centers and potential field locations to include federal headquarters facilities in the Washington D.C. area, and in federal, regional, state, tribal, local and private sector facilities in FEMA Region VI, which includes the states of Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma and Texas.

EXERCISE OBJECTIVES

Through a comprehensive evaluation process, the exercise will assess prevention and protection capabilities both nationally and regionally. Although NLE 09 is still in the planning stages, the exercise is currently designed to validate the following capabilities:

• Intelligence/Information Sharing and Dissemination
• Counter-Terrorism Investigation and Law Enforcement
• Air, Border and Maritime Security
• Critical Infrastructure Protection
• Public and Private Sector Alert/Notification and Security Advisories
• International Coordination

VALIDATING THE HOMELAND SECURITY SYSTEM

Exercises such as NLE 09 are an important component of national preparedness, helping to build an integrated federal, state, tribal, local and private sector capability to prevent terrorist attacks, and rapidly and effectively respond to, and recover from, any terrorist attack or major disaster that occurs.

The full-scale exercise offers agencies and jurisdictions a way to test their plans and skills in a real-time, realistic environment and to gain the in-depth knowledge that only experience can provide. Participants will exercise prevention and information sharing functions that are critical to preventing terrorist attacks. Lessons learned from the exercise will provide valuable insights to guide future planning for securing the nation against terrorist attacks, disasters, and other emergencies.

For more information about NLE 09, contact the FEMA News Desk: 202-646-4600.
 
FEMA leads and supports the nation in a risk-based, comprehensive emergency management system of preparedness, protection, response, recovery, and mitigation, to reduce the loss of life and property and protect the nation from all hazards including natural disasters, acts of terrorism and other man-made disasters.

==============

Who does FEMA say those terrorists are? Watch them for yourself!

They say that Christians, founding fathers and homeschoolers are terrorists.

http://targetfreedom.typepad.com/targetfreedom/2009/03/fedsslanderchristiansandpatriots.html

 

Sit in on an actual FEMA Gestapo training class:

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XC1fk_EO3c 

 

(Click the rectangle in the lower right to go to full screen)

http://www.24hourforums.com/view_topic.php?id=25587&forum_id=109&jump_to=252929

http://tinyurl.com/bj3qey

=========

DHS Office has Issued a "Glossary of Domestic Extremist Groups". 
The Office of Intelligence and Analysis uses a broad brush to define
dozens of supposedly extremist ideologies inside the United States, in a
report called "Domestic Extremism Lexicon":
Read the entire document here:
http://www.constitution.org/abus/dhs/hsra-domestic-extremismlexicon_165213935473.pdf 

 

Read a discussion here:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=96916

 

The document covers a broad range of extremist causes, including anti-
abortion, anti-immigration, animal rights, black separatism, anti-technology
extremism, Cuban independence activism, tax resistors, and religious
extremism of various faiths.

 

A few examples:
Tax resistance extremists are people who "vehemently believe taxes
violate their constitutional rights.

 

There are broad descriptions of extremists as “mainly antigovernment,
rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority”; “may include groups
and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to
abortion or immigration”. 

Why will Obama need foreign troops to impose martial law?

Military and law enforcement personnel are organizing to resist illegal orders

to impose tyranny.

Visit:

http://oath-keepers.blogspot.com/2009/03/oath-keepers-declaration-of-orders-we.html 

 

Below is a link to a story on an Army reservist who challenged orders from President Obama to deploy to Afghanistan. He wants to know Obama has the legal authority to be President by seeing his birth certificate, not just the short form. The Army REVOKED HIS ORDERS. If they make a case against him, then Amendment VI, and the rules of evidence for discovery, would give him the right to SUBPOENA the birth certificate of Obama. Why not do that?

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=104009 

 

Retired general, lieutenant colonel join reservist’s lawsuit over Obama's birth status

http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/news/story/778482.html 

They swore an oath to "support and defend the United States Constitution". The United States Constitution says that the President (Commander in Chief) must be a NATURAL BORN citizen.

 

But does Obama even have the support of the rest of the world?

Obama Handshake Snub in Russia

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHEposwhovk&feature=related 

LOCAL GOVERNMENT can be a defense against central tyranny. 

Alert your local representatives and police.

Ask them to protect your civil liberties.

Our county Sheriff's have the same obligation, and we all need to contact our local departments and remind them of their duties and the oath they are sworn to uphold.

For details visit:

Sheriff Mack The Power of the County Sheriff

http://tinyurl.com/lsnzad
or

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QiBcC8_goVg&videos=-sXxXQwBioc&playnext_from=TL&playnext=1 

 =========

 

Adam Kokesh speech- Inspirational and informative. You can almost hear our founding fathers cheering from Heaven

Adam Kokesh speech

http://targetfreedom.typepad.com/targetfreedom/2008/10/adam-kokesh-speech.html 

Or watch it here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbOp_9VfR6o

 

Posterity--you will never know how much it has cost my generation to preserve your freedom. I hope you will make good use of it.

                      .... John Quincy Adams

 

Read Patrick Henry Give Me Liberty Or Give Me Death  and compare it to our times

http://libertyonline.hypermall.com/henry-liberty.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DzAzvLWG0a8&feature=related

What Would Patrick Henry Say Today?

http://targetfreedom.typepad.com/targetfreedom/2009/02/patrick-henry-today.html

 

 

Below you will see what Patrick Henry said in 1775.                    

Read this in the original form. Then read this again, and change a few words:                  

Change "British ministry" to "federal government".
Change "kings" to "tyrants".
Change "Great Britain"  to "Washington".
Change "ministry and Parliament" to "federal government".
Change "throne" to "federal government". 
Change "British guard" to "federal officer".
Change "Boston" to "Waco and Ruby Ridge".

Here is what Patrick Henry said on March 23, 1775:

No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the House. But different men often see the same subject in different lights; and, therefore, I hope it will not be thought disrespectful to those gentlemen if, entertaining as I do opinions of a character very opposite to theirs, I shall speak forth my sentiments freely and without reserve. This is no time for ceremony. The questing before the House is one of awful moment to this country. For my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.

Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it.

I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the past. And judging by the past, I wish to know what there has been in the conduct of the British ministry for the last ten years to justify those hopes with which gentlemen have been pleased to solace themselves and the House. Is it that insidious smile with which our petition has been lately received? Trust it not, sir; it will prove a snare to your feet. Suffer not yourselves to be betrayed with a kiss. Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of our petition comports with those warlike preparations which cover our waters and darken our land. Are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and reconciliation? Have we shown ourselves so unwilling to be reconciled that force must be called in to win back our love? Let us not deceive ourselves, sir. These are the implements of war and subjugation; the last arguments to which kings resort. I ask gentlemen, sir, what means this martial array, if its purpose be not to force us to submission? Can gentlemen assign any other possible motive for it? Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter of the world, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies? No, sir, she has none. They are meant for us: they can be meant for no other. They are sent over to bind and rivet upon us those chains which the British ministry have been so long forging. And what have we to oppose to them? Shall we try argument? Sir, we have been trying that for the last ten years. Have we anything new to offer upon the subject? Nothing. We have held the subject up in every light of which it is capable; but it has been all in vain. Shall we resort to entreaty and humble supplication? What terms shall we find which have not been already exhausted? Let us not, I beseech you, sir, deceive ourselves. Sir, we have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and Parliament. Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt, from the foot of the throne! In vain, after these things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace and reconciliation. There is no longer any room for hope. If we wish to be free-- if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending--if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained--we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to the God of hosts is all that is left us!

They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength by irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by lying supinely on our backs and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot? Sir, we are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. The millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations, and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable--and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come.

It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace-- but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!

Source material on the ideas of the founders of the American republic:

We Hold These Truths: A Reverent Review of the U. S. Constitution 1993 Revised Edition (Paperback) by Congressman Lawrence P. McDonald

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001EEF7JK?ie=UTF8&seller=A1AVPSERX4QF0E&sn=jperna12 

 

CAMP FEMA - Thought Crime Division

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=chC82M9w__0&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fcampfema%2Ecom%2F&feature=player_embedded 

 

We Hold These Truths: A Reverent Review of the U. S. Constitution by Congressman Lawrence P. McDonald  Hardcover

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001TZENA8?ie=UTF8&seller=A1AVPSERX4QF0E&sn=jperna12 

The watchman on the wall

Ezekiel 33
Ezekiel a Watchman
 1 The word of the LORD came to me:

2 "Son of man, speak to your countrymen and say to them:
'When I bring the sword against a land, and the people of the land choose one of their men and make him their watchman,

3 and he sees the sword coming against the land and blows the trumpet
to warn the people,

4 then if anyone hears the trumpet but does not take warning and the sword
comes and takes his life, his blood will be on his own head.

5 Since he heard the sound of the trumpet but did not take warning, his blood will be on his own head. If he had taken warning, he would have saved himself.

6 But if the watchman sees the sword coming and does not blow the trumpet to warn the people and the sword comes and takes the life of one of them, that man will be taken away because of his sin, but I will hold the watchman accountable for his blood.'

Imagine this scenario:

Two watchman on the wall lookout across the horizon and see a massive army  approaching. One grabs the trumpet and raises it to his lips to warn the people. The other says:

"Now, wait a minute. If you blow that trumpet you are going to scare a lot of people. The people are asleep now. Would it not be better to let them sleep peacefully until this army is actually inside the city killing people, and setting the city on fire? The people are not ready to hear about this yet. This army has not killed anyone yet. Have they? What can the people do about that army anyway? I think it would be better if we just organize a study club to debate about the issues.

 

Adolf Hitler killed 6 million. There are 300 million Americans. If you fail to warn the American people you will have more blood on your head the Hitler. Life is short. Eternity is not.

 

A great song, and a tribute to our founding fathers:

Mr. Jefferson -The Mike Church Show Band

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DvxSQr95wvs

 

"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root." --- Henry David Thoreau

Constitutional Journal: A Correspondent's Report from the Convention of 1787 by Jeffrey St. John
Foreword by Supreme Court Justice Warren E. Burger  Hardcover

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0915463423?ie=UTF8&seller=A1AVPSERX4QF0E&sn=jperna12

Call every level of government: Federal, state or local

CONGRESSIONAL SWITCHBOARD  202 224-3121

(NOT TOLL FREE BUT ALWAYS WORKING)

TOLL FREE NUMBERS WHICH ARE TEMPORARY:

800 828-0498,   800 459-1887,   866-340-7281, 877-851-6437, 

866-333-1015, 800-426-8073, 800 614-2803, 866 340-9281,

SENATE               800-620-4394

Pass them on

Voter Voice.net

http://www.votervoice.net/Core.aspx?AID=972&APP=GAC&

 

Write letters to the editor. Call radio talk shows. Pass this message on.

In Their Own Words (Paperback)  Various quotations from the founders 

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001EIIQJO?ie=UTF8&seller=A1AVPSERX4QF0E&sn=jperna12

Foreign troops inside of this country is an invasion even if they do nothing except pick up litter on the streets. When they get here, try telling them to get out of your country, and see what happens.

 

A foreign army inside of our country is like a having a few cockroaches inside of your house. You never know what it will take to get rid of them. This is especially true when OUR OWN government is made up of New World Order global government socialists. The concentration camps are already built:  

 

http://targetfreedom.typepad.com/targetfreedom/2009/02/gulag-archipelago-excerpt.html

 

Here is why they need foreign troops:

http://oath-keepers.blogspot.com/

 

Try this Google search:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rlz=1T4ADBR_enUS229US229&q=oathkeepers.blogspot.com&aq=2&oq=Oathkeepers&aqi=g5

 

The day that foreign troops land on American soil will be the beginning of a war, regardless of the way, in which this has been described. Our sovereignty as a nation will be under attack.

RESPONDING TO COMMENTS ON FEMA international and federal troops

Some of the comment concerning this article focuses on a semantic trick arising from the fact that the word "troops" was not actually used on the FEMA web page. This is done, inspite of the fact that the mission is defined as "will focus exclusively on terrorism prevention and protection". Such a function cannot be performed without armed force. Can we imagine a force for prevention and protection made up of "observers and advisors".

 

This is clarified later as: "NLE 09 will focus on intelligence and information sharing among intelligence and law enforcement communities, and between international, federal, regional, state, tribal, local and private sector participants."

 

The term "troops" includes both law enforcement and military. Gestapo storm troopers were militarized police under the control of the central government. It is amazing how easily all governments, including our own, deceive people with semantics. The Korean war was called a "police action". Our entry into Viet Nam was with "observers and advisors".

 

For a good idea of how the semantic deception works, watch this:

Obama Lies (There is inappropriate language used. )

http://tinyurl.com/mx8kh7

 

Billy Vegas - The Militarization of Our Police

The Militarization of Our Police

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INdcaeeb3ws 

a somewhat humerous discussion of a serious subject

 

http://lonestartimes.com/2009/02/11/militarizing-police-depts-with-your-bailout-money/ 

 

National Police

In every call for more power, for 
government, there should be strict adherence to the highest law in the land;

The Constitution.  

Nothing in any other type of law can abrogate the constitutional rights of American citizens.
We must not destroy freedom in the name of defending freedom.

 

Our constitution did not give the law enforcement function to the federal
government.

The 10th amendment PROHIBITS any federal law enforcement functions.

 

"If, in the opinion of the people, the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the constitution designates.–But let there be no change by usurpation; for though this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed."

 

            George Washington

 

The constitution is not amended by a judge's opinion.

The constitution is not whatever a judge says it is.

The judge is whatever the constitution says HE is.

The constitution is not whatever congress says it is.

The congress is whatever the constitution says  it is.

The fox must not be guarding the hen house.

 

The 10th amendment is very clear.

The 10th amendment PROHIBITS the federal government from having any other function,

other than those that ARE SPECIFICALLY GIVEN TO IT, BY THE CONSTITUTION.

Every DICTATORSHIP gives the law enforcement function to the CENTRAL
government.

This is the derivation of the term "POLICE STATE".

The best explanation of this is found in:

 "The Disturbing Trend Toward Federal Police" by Congressman Ron Paul

http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2000/tst073100.htm

 

FBI stands for Federal Bureau of INVESTIGATION.

When the FBI was formed, the FBI was accepted as constitutional,

on THAT basis. Their job was to GATHER EVIDENCE.
That evidence was then turned over to LOCAL POLICE, who made the arrests.

The BATF was formed to administer over the COLLECTION OF TAXES,

on alcohol, tobacco and firearms.

The BATF was not formed to USE firearms against the American people.

Most crimes are not "federal" in jurisdiction.

Yes, there is no doubt that the scope of the federal government in law
enforcement HAS been expanded.
Where does it stop?

All Dictatorships have national military police; which
are under the command of the central government ("police state").

Our founding fathers gave us a constitution,

which entrusted all that power to local governments.

 The FBI and BATF actions: at Waco against the Branch Davidians,

and at Ruby Ridge against the Weaver family,

are examples of the developing American Gestapo.
Did we not notice the TANKS AND FLAME THROWERS that were being to be used on woman and children???

George Orwell's "thought police" are here.

The propaganda machine demonizes their victims.

The term "cult member" is just American for "thought criminal".
Do citizens now risk government oppression,

for unpopular religious or political beliefs?

Who decides if your church is a "cult" or not?

Is your church BATF approved?

Can freedom of religion exist,

if the government can take it away with the word "cult"?

So what if "cults" exist.

Are we free to decide what we want?

NO Charges against the Branch Davidians were ever substantiated. 

Police actions, which occur before trials, must not be executions.

Citizens are innocent until PROVEN guilty in a COURT OF LAW.

If we can be killed in our homes,
then there will never be a trial.

It is the job of police, to bring those who are accused of crimes into a court of law,

where they will be given a fair trial.

It is NOT the job of police, to KILL those who are accused of crimes in the streets or in their homes, or in anyone else's home.

It is my understanding that there are as many as 30 federal agencies that
are creating paramilitary police organizations. Maybe more?

These agencies have now been combined under the Department of Homeland Security.

 

It is illegal to use the American military against American citizens.

Americans should be aware of this,

and should insist that training be done in a manner that respects this reality,

and in a manner that does not create precedents,

or indoctrinate us for a mind set that would accept the violation

of this law.

 

Constitutional rights:

 

    Freedom of religion

    Freedom of speech

    Freedom of assembly
   The right to keep and bear arms.

 

        Are NOT dependent on which religion or ideology someone believes. If one group can be liquidated, it will just be a matter of time before they get around YOU.

 

The Homeland Security Act

formalized the creation of the Gestapo.

It is time to update a famous quote from Rev. Martin Niemoller

Rev. Martin Niemoller, commenting on events in Germany 1933-1939 said:

 

"In Germany, they came first for the Communists,

and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist.

Then they came for the Jews,

and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists,

and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Catholics, and
I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant.

Then they came for me, and by that time, no one was left to
speak up." -- Rev. Dr. Martin Niemoeller, July 1,
1937; arrested by the Third Reich

An update of this concept, with the United States in mind, would go like this:

"First they burned the house of the Symbionese Liberation Army and killed all of their members. Most of us did not object because we did not believe in the same things as the Symbionese Liberation Army.

Then they dropped a bomb on the building of the Philadelphia MOVE group, and destroyed two city blocks, and killed 11 members. Most of us did not object because we did not believe in the same things as the MOVE group.

Then they burned a house to kill Gordon Kahl, a tax protester, and killed him. Most of us did not object because we did not believe in the same things as Gordon Kahl.

Then they burned  a house to kill Robert Matthews, leader of "The Order," and killed him. Most of us did not object because we did not believe in the same things as Robert Matthews.

Then they conducted a siege and a raid of 80-member Covenant of the Sword and Arm of the Lord religious group. Most of us did not object because we did not believe in the same things as the Covenant of the Sword and Arm of the Lord.

Then they conducted a siege and a raid of Randy Weaver's family, and killed or wounded nearly everyone present; even including a baby and the dog. Many of us did not object because we did not believe in the same things as Randy Weaver's family.

Then they burned the church of the Branch Davidians and killed nearly all of them. A few of us did not object because we did not believe in the same things as the Branch Davidians

And then they kidnapped Elian Gonzalez ..."

John Perna  April 22, 2000

"An evil exists that threatens every man, woman, 
and child of this great nation. 
We must take steps to ensure our domestic security and protect our homeland."
   
- Adolf Hitler, proposing the creation of the Gestapo in Nazi 
Germany.
 
Sound familiar?
 America, you better pull yer head out...........
 
Memorize this:
 Homeland Security=Gestapo
 Homeland Security=Gestapo
 Homeland Security=Gestapo
 Homeland Security=Gestapo
 Homeland Security=Gestapo
 Homeland Security=Gestapo
 

"If a nation or individual values anything more than freedom, it will lose
it's freedom; and the irony is that if it is comfort or money it values
more, it will lose that too."
--W. Somerset Maugham

 

"Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority.
It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the
people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who
mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good
masters, but they mean to be masters."  -- Daniel Webster

 

"Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when
the government's purposes are beneficent. Men born to freedom are naturally
alert to repel invasion of their liberty by evil-minded rulers. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding."
Louis D. Brandeis (1856-1941) - American judge

 

Sarah Palin and Mark Sandford are the two governors who are the most likely to oppose federal encroachment. They are both being dragged down at the same time. This just happens to be right before the FEMA martial law training with foreign troops. Is this the biggest coincidence in American history, or is it something else?

 

Sorry  for my pessimistic attitude,

    but...picture this; 

You are a German citizen in the late1930's or early forties,

and YOU UNDERSTAND THE CHANGE THAT IS TAKING PLACE,

under Hitler's reign.

Most people do not have a clue about what is coming,

and spend all available time in silly amusements. 

WHAT WOULD YOU DO?.

 

Most of those, who UNDERSTAND THE CHANGE THAT IS TAKING PLACE,

may ALREADY be wondering if it is too late.

Most of those, who UNDERSTAND THE CHANGE THAT IS TAKING PLACE,

ARE ALREADY AFRAID TO RESIST.

The Department of Homeland Security already has the power to oppress you

in the name of protecting the Fatherland

Can you really picture it?

Need we say more?  

The watchman on the wall

Ezekiel 33
Ezekiel a Watchman
 1 The word of the LORD came to me:

2 "Son of man, speak to your countrymen and say to them:
'When I bring the sword against a land, and the people of the land choose one of their men and make him their watchman,

3 and he sees the sword coming against the land and blows the trumpet
to warn the people,

4 then if anyone hears the trumpet but does not take warning and the sword
comes and takes his life, his blood will be on his own head.

5 Since he heard the sound of the trumpet but did not take warning, his blood will be on his own head. If he had taken warning, he would have saved himself.

6 But if the watchman sees the sword coming and does not blow the trumpet to warn the people and the sword comes and takes the life of one of them, that man will be taken away because of his sin, but I will hold the watchman accountable for his blood.'

 

 

Imagine this scenario:

Two watchman on the wall lookout across the horizon and see a massive army  approaching. One grabs the trumpet and raises it to his lips to warn the people. The other says:

"Now, wait a minute. If you blow that trumpet you are going to scare a lot of people. The people are asleep now. Would it not be better to let them sleep peacefully until this army is actually inside the city killing people, and setting the city on fire? The people are not ready to hear about this yet. This army has not killed anyone yet. Have they? What can the people do about that army anyway? I think it would be better if we just organize a study club to debate about the issues.

 

Adolf Hitler killed 6 million. There are 300 million Americans. If you fail to warn the American people you will have more blood on your head the Hitler. Life is short. Eternity is not.

 

"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root." --- Henry David Thoreau

 

(Click the rectangle in the lower right to go to full screen)

http://tinyurl.com/bj3qey

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbOp_9VfR6o

 

Posterity--you will never know how much it has cost my generation to preserve your freedom. I hope you will make good use of it.

                      .... John Quincy Adams

                      .... John Quincy Adams

 

 

Below you will see what Patrick Henry said in 1775.                    

Read this in the original form. Then read this again, and change a few words:                  

Change "British ministry" to "federal government".
Change "kings" to "tyrants".
Change "Great Britain"  to "Washington".
Change "ministry and Parliament" to "federal government".
Change "throne" to "federal government". 
Change "British guard" to "federal officer".
Change "Boston" to "Waco and Ruby Ridge".

Here is what Patrick Henry said on March 23, 1775:

No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the House. But different men often see the same subject in different lights; and, therefore, I hope it will not be thought disrespectful to those gentlemen if, entertaining as I do opinions of a character very opposite to theirs, I shall speak forth my sentiments freely and without reserve. This is no time for ceremony. The questing before the House is one of awful moment to this country. For my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.

Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it.

I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the past. And judging by the past, I wish to know what there has been in the conduct of the British ministry for the last ten years to justify those hopes with which gentlemen have been pleased to solace themselves and the House. Is it that insidious smile with which our petition has been lately received? Trust it not, sir; it will prove a snare to your feet. Suffer not yourselves to be betrayed with a kiss. Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of our petition comports with those warlike preparations which cover our waters and darken our land. Are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and reconciliation? Have we shown ourselves so unwilling to be reconciled that force must be called in to win back our love? Let us not deceive ourselves, sir. These are the implements of war and subjugation; the last arguments to which kings resort. I ask gentlemen, sir, what means this martial array, if its purpose be not to force us to submission? Can gentlemen assign any other possible motive for it? Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter of the world, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies? No, sir, she has none. They are meant for us: they can be meant for no other. They are sent over to bind and rivet upon us those chains which the British ministry have been so long forging. And what have we to oppose to them? Shall we try argument? Sir, we have been trying that for the last ten years. Have we anything new to offer upon the subject? Nothing. We have held the subject up in every light of which it is capable; but it has been all in vain. Shall we resort to entreaty and humble supplication? What terms shall we find which have not been already exhausted? Let us not, I beseech you, sir, deceive ourselves. Sir, we have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and Parliament. Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt, from the foot of the throne! In vain, after these things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace and reconciliation. There is no longer any room for hope. If we wish to be free-- if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending--if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained--we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to the God of hosts is all that is left us!

They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength by irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by lying supinely on our backs and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot? Sir, we are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. The millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations, and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable--and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come.

It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace-- but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!

Source material on the ideas of the founders of the American republic:

We Hold These Truths: A Reverent Review of the U. S. Constitution 1993 Revised Edition (Paperback) by Congressman Lawrence P. McDonald

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001EEF7JK?ie=UTF8&seller=A1AVPSERX4QF0E&sn=jperna12 

 

CAMP FEMA - Thought Crime Division

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=chC82M9w__0&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fcampfema%2Ecom%2F&feature=player_embedded 

 

We Hold These Truths: A Reverent Review of the U. S. Constitution by Congressman Lawrence P. McDonald  Hardcover

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001TZENA8?ie=UTF8&seller=A1AVPSERX4QF0E&sn=jperna12 

The watchman on the wall

Ezekiel 33
Ezekiel a Watchman
 1 The word of the LORD came to me:

2 "Son of man, speak to your countrymen and say to them:
'When I bring the sword against a land, and the people of the land choose one of their men and make him their watchman,

3 and he sees the sword coming against the land and blows the trumpet
to warn the people,

4 then if anyone hears the trumpet but does not take warning and the sword
comes and takes his life, his blood will be on his own head.

5 Since he heard the sound of the trumpet but did not take warning, his blood will be on his own head. If he had taken warning, he would have saved himself.

6 But if the watchman sees the sword coming and does not blow the trumpet to warn the people and the sword comes and takes the life of one of them, that man will be taken away because of his sin, but I will hold the watchman accountable for his blood.'

Imagine this scenario:

Two watchman on the wall lookout across the horizon and see a massive army  approaching. One grabs the trumpet and raises it to his lips to warn the people. The other says:

"Now, wait a minute. If you blow that trumpet you are going to scare a lot of people. The people are asleep now. Would it not be better to let them sleep peacefully until this army is actually inside the city killing people, and setting the city on fire? The people are not ready to hear about this yet. This army has not killed anyone yet. Have they? What can the people do about that army anyway? I think it would be better if we just organize a study club to debate about the issues.

 

Adolf Hitler killed 6 million. There are 300 million Americans. If you fail to warn the American people you will have more blood on your head the Hitler. Life is short. Eternity is not.

 

A great song, and a tribute to our founding fathers:

Mr. Jefferson -The Mike Church Show Band

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DvxSQr95wvs

 

"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root." --- Henry David Thoreau

Comments

[MrMr]

So what?? America have military is in over 100 nations but it's ok? time is changing.

[Hal]

I don't feel I dare make a comment, they might send someone afterf me!!

[Aldred]

I'll comment all I want .... the LYING .... can kiss my .....
----------------------------------------
www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/02/26/60minutes/main4831806.shtml
Above is a transcript from March2nd 60 MINUTES. In brief, the Government acknowledges that it has no control of the border. TONS of drugs and Millions of ILLEGALS enter this country. TONS of cash and TONS of weapons leave this country. They have no way of knowing how many "TERRORISTS" have crossed (IF there IS such a creature)
TWO things were of major interest:
(1) The Department of Homeland STUPIDITY acknowledges they have no control - therefore, HOW are they going to protect you from TERRORISTS, if they cannot stop gangbangers.
(2) The "head" of the Department of Homeland STUPIDITY (and others) tries to blame YOUR right to keep and bear ARMS for the weapons going south. The only trouble is ........ they showed and talked of MISSILES, HAND GRENADES, BELT FED MACHINES GUNS. Those are weapons STOLEN FROM THE AMERICAN MILITARY. They are not coming from the SEMI-auto Civilian world! They are direct from your Military's ARMORIES. Not only can your Government NOT PROTECT the borders .... and YOU. The Government CANNOT HANG ON TO IT'S OWN WEAPONS!!! And then they try to use THEIR failures to attack YOUR RIGHTS.
You all need to go out and get MORE guns, because this government cannot protect you from ANYTHING. As a matter of fact, the police have NO "obligation" to protect individuals (You OR your FAMILY). Their purpose is to protect "society" (the government).
Do not believe me? Go research it, it has been "upheld" in many court cases..

[Aldred]

Everybody knows how to make things. If you can make things, you can break things. The ONLY way you/we are going to bring this mess to heel is to break so many things that nothing works any more and they HAVE to fix things right. So get out there and start breaking.

[R Gillert]

Until our legal system eliminates the crooked judges/lawyers that twist/bend the laws to free criminals we have no 2nd amendment.Punishment must be swift and just we cannot afford to spend 50K perYR per inmate when sentences are dragged out for years.Our system is laughed at by others.{ lived in those countries and when you are caught/guilty you pay the price CASE CLOSE NO BLEEDING HEARTS proteting--Think the Steve McQueen movie PAPION a criminal run island where they cannot escape and no expense to the country they came from--That should be our model

[m]

Americans should have protested the hell out of many of the things our government was doing in our name. and we didn't. The immorality of this boggles the mind.

What goes around, comes around.

I wonder if the Clinton, Bush, Dodd etc children and grandchildren will be saved from it.

[ec]

If you do not know from where your 'marching orders' are coming. you shouldn't march!
The gullible public, military and police etc. DO NOT WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON!
They just follow orders.
I have heard that people in the military and law enforcement are some the easiest people to hypnotize..why? because they are udes to 'following orders'!

[Pepper]

You are absolutely right, its an invasion and remember, obama signed a treaty about a week ago that mandates he provide all our census information and GPS mapping to FOREIGN TROOPS, WHY?????

To get our guns. They will fire on Americans while American troops would not. Its time we call on our soldiers to refuse to fight in all theatres of war for profit.... that is all wars we are in right now. Its time we stand up against invasion of our nation and all those who would fight against us.

[polecat]

Why do you imagine that British, Australian or Canadian troops would want to fire on you any more than your own troops?

[fragmatic]

What is your point by tying Larry Grathwol's comments about his experience with the Weather Underground to FEMA? Where is the connection?

[nelson]

i dont think it started at waco or ruby ridge i believe it started at jonestown in guiana that many people didnt just commit suicide they were taken out by us forces.or at least thats a story i heard from a guy who was in the navy seals.

[Rick Adam]

The page colors and style make this site useless as it is unreadable!

[MG]

Restore Constitutional Sovereignty

[LoneWolf]

Chinese troops amassing near border
preparing to invade USA under the full acceptance and participation of the Obama administration:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCM24Og2Jqo

[fred]

This is a total violation of our constitutional rights. Our privacy and security is being destroyed. I wrote all the congress reps to stop this! Blame GW Bush's Grandfather who gave money to Hitler!

[instep jogging stroller]

very interesting content. I love the passion that politics brings out in people. I don't really agree with some of this content, but it's an interesting point of view

[UK Online Pharmacy]

interesting content I was looking for this information is very clear and interesting.

[Senior Communities]

Great information very useful and I want to know more about topics like this and I'd like to read more post like this. Great work congratulations.