Visit:
COUNTING VOTES IN SECRET IS AN OPEN, BALD FACED ADMISSION OF CORRUPTION.
The only honest election is paper ballots counted in public view, and the elimination electronic vote counting. If Iowa GOP tabulates caucus returns in secret, they will insure their own demise. In the future, this same party will continuously be asking people for donations, for votes in other elections, and for campaign workers. After destroying their own credibility through unscrupulous behavior, there will be no one left who believes them to be worthy of support. Third parties should make ready for an influx of new supporters.
Iowa GOP moving vote-count to 'undisclosed location'
http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2011/12/iowa-gop-moving-votecount-to-undisclosed-location-108812.html
http://www.watchthevote2012.com/
Read these and the EMail below. GET READY!!
Subject: FROM Kurt
(12-24) 17:41 PST WASHINGTON (AP) --
Republican presidential hopeful Newt Gingrich failed to qualify for Virginia's Super Tuesday primary ballot, the latest setback for a candidate whose standing in polls has been slipping. Gingrich's campaign said he would pursue an aggressive write-in campaign, though state law prohibits write-ins on primary ballots.
Jon Huntsman 0.26% (3 votes)
Michele Bachmann 0.26% (3 votes)
Tim Pawlenty 0% (0 votes)
Rick Santorum 0% (0 votes)
Total Votes: 1,136
Gary Johnson 2.34% (42 votes)
Tim Pawlenty 1% (18 votes)
Newt Gingrich 0.95% (17 votes)
Michele Bachmann 0.5% (9 votes)
Thaddeus McCotter 0.39% (7 votes)
Rick Perry 0.39% (7 votes)
Rick Santorum 0.33% (6 votes)
Mitt Romney 0.06% (1 votes)
Jon Huntsman 0% (0 votes)
Total Votes: 1,793
View the "Consciousness Message" from the movie V for Vendetta:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iT6HNsmdGPQ&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iT6HNsmdGPQ&feature=related
Voters can send a strong message to Iowa GOP. TELL THEM NOW, BEFORE THEY MAKE THIS MISTAKE:
THERE WILL BE NO SUPPORT FOR THE IOWA GOP EVER AGAIN, IF THEY LOSE THEIR INTEGRITY.
The only SUPPORT THAT THE IOWA GOP WILL HAVE WILL BE WHAT RON PAUL BRINGS TO THEM.
Here is the Iowa GOP web page:
VISIT SOON, AS IT MIGHT BE CLOSED AFTER THE CAUCUS, IF THE Iowa GOP CEASES TO EXIST DUE TO NATIONAL REPUDIATION.
Ron Paul Says Watch The Vote - Iowa Caucus 2012 (READ DESCRIPTION)
Message to "PARTY BOSSES":
Guess what? You are not the boss!
Your former supporters are STILL the bosses. By the way, your coniving is not going to work. You will be caught. The votes will be counted BEFORE they are sent to your "undisclosed location".
ADVISE TO Matt Strawn, the chairman of the Republican Party of Iowa:
DO NOT QUIT YOUR DAY JOB.
HOW TO GET AN HONEST VOTE COUNT IN THE Iowa Caucus
PROOF Rigged Election - Watch the Vote 2012 - Iowa Caucus
The volume of talk about potential voter fraud has increased. We are preparing to meet potential threats by ensuring an accurate tally for paper ballots. See this website
www.TransparentVote.net and sign up.
www.TransparentVote.net and sign up.
Here's what we're up against:
Iowa GOP moving vote-count to 'undisclosed location'
http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2011/12/iowa-gop-moving-votecount-to-undisclosed-location-108812.html
http://www.watchthevote2012.com/
Read these and the EMail below. GET READY!!
Subject: FROM Kurt
Iowa Caucuses -- Will the threat from Anonymous serve as an excuse for hanky-panky in Iowa next week?
All of you folks have distribution lists, so I'm asking you to get back to me and tell me if you're willing to support initiatives to ensure an honest and accurate vote count in Iowa. You have my email address.
All of you folks have distribution lists, so I'm asking you to get back to me and tell me if you're willing to support initiatives to ensure an honest and accurate vote count in Iowa. You have my email address.
My cell phone is 312-804-4233 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 312-804-4233 end_of_the_skype_highlighting.
My home phone is 940-497-2124 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 940-497-2124 end_of_the_skype_highlighting. I
f you have any suggestions, they're welcome, too.
Here's my article on The New American Online:
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/10342--is-the-cure-for-disruption-threat-at-iowa-caucuses-worse-than-the-threat
I see two dangers in what's going on:
Using "security" to implement paper ballots that are counted in secret or otherwise tampered with, and
Using "security" to implement police control points and stifle the Ron Paul people by threatening to accuse them of being disruptive.
I checked the Iowa Republican Party's web site. It looks like they'll be requiring paper ballots for the Presidential vote (This may be a change. I didn't see it last week when I wrote the TNA article above.), but there are no methods listed to protect the vote from ballot box stuffing, ahead of time or after, or to ensure the ballots are counted on site, in public, and immediately after being cast.
http://iowagop.org/caucus/process.php
I think what we need is an agenda. Instead of waiting until 7:00 PM on January 3rd and being surprised by whatever procedures are being thrown at us, let's try to proactively get the Iowa GOP to add the following electoral safeguards to the 2012 Caucuses. We'll need to contact Iowa GOP members and ask them to initiate these ahead of time or at the caucuses.
Honest and Accurate Vote Count Initiative:
In order to protect the Iowa Caucuses from electoral fraud and from being disrupted by external organizations, we adopt the following security procedures:
If this caucus location has traditionally used a show of hands for voting, that will be the primary method for the 2012 caucus as well.
If this caucus decides to vote via paper ballots, the ballots must not be removed from the premises until after they have been counted in public immediately after being cast, in the presence of the people who cast them, and with an opportunity for representatives of the candidates to challenge.
There will be no restrictions on the use of video or audio recording devices. In order to reconstruct caucus results if such reconstruction becomes necessary, video and audio recording of the final announcements of the vote totals by as many people as possible will be encouraged.
Here's my article on The New American Online:
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/10342--is-the-cure-for-disruption-threat-at-iowa-caucuses-worse-than-the-threat
I see two dangers in what's going on:
Using "security" to implement paper ballots that are counted in secret or otherwise tampered with, and
Using "security" to implement police control points and stifle the Ron Paul people by threatening to accuse them of being disruptive.
I checked the Iowa Republican Party's web site. It looks like they'll be requiring paper ballots for the Presidential vote (This may be a change. I didn't see it last week when I wrote the TNA article above.), but there are no methods listed to protect the vote from ballot box stuffing, ahead of time or after, or to ensure the ballots are counted on site, in public, and immediately after being cast.
http://iowagop.org/caucus/process.php
I think what we need is an agenda. Instead of waiting until 7:00 PM on January 3rd and being surprised by whatever procedures are being thrown at us, let's try to proactively get the Iowa GOP to add the following electoral safeguards to the 2012 Caucuses. We'll need to contact Iowa GOP members and ask them to initiate these ahead of time or at the caucuses.
Honest and Accurate Vote Count Initiative:
In order to protect the Iowa Caucuses from electoral fraud and from being disrupted by external organizations, we adopt the following security procedures:
If this caucus location has traditionally used a show of hands for voting, that will be the primary method for the 2012 caucus as well.
If this caucus decides to vote via paper ballots, the ballots must not be removed from the premises until after they have been counted in public immediately after being cast, in the presence of the people who cast them, and with an opportunity for representatives of the candidates to challenge.
There will be no restrictions on the use of video or audio recording devices. In order to reconstruct caucus results if such reconstruction becomes necessary, video and audio recording of the final announcements of the vote totals by as many people as possible will be encouraged.
WHY Only Paul and Romney Qualify in Virginia for Primary
http://targetfreedom.com/ron-paul/why-only-paul-and-romney-qualify-in-virginia-for-primary/
Gingrich and Perry fail to qualify for Va. primary ballot. Bachmann, Santorum and Huntsman did not even try to qualify?
WHEN THE ONLY SUPPORTERS THAT A CANDIDATE HAS ARE BANKERS, CORPORATIONS, LOBBYISTS, AND ELECTRONIC VOTE COUNTING MACHINES IT IS HARD TO MEET A REQUIREMENT FOR SIGNATURES ON PETITIONS. WHAT THE NEOCON BANKERS, CORPORATIONS, AND LOBBYISTS WILL DO NOW IS TO USE BACK ROOM DEALS, MONEY, AND POWER TO CIRCUMVENT THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE, AND TO CHANGE THE LAW, SO THAT THE SHILLS CAN GET INTO THE ELECTRONIC VOTE COUNTING MACHINES.
Virginia is approximately 10% of the Super Tuesday Vote so that is a significant number. Does this not explain WHY Ron Paul is electable, WHY he CAN Win; And WHY Gingrich, Perry, Bachmann, Santorum and Huntsman are NOT electable and CAN'T win? YES VIRGINIA, THE PEOPLE WANT TO BE FREE.
(12-24) 17:41 PST WASHINGTON (AP) --
Republican presidential hopeful Newt Gingrich failed to qualify for Virginia's Super Tuesday primary ballot, the latest setback for a candidate whose standing in polls has been slipping. Gingrich's campaign said he would pursue an aggressive write-in campaign, though state law prohibits write-ins on primary ballots.
The state party said early Saturday that Gingrich and Texas Gov. Rick Perry had failed to submit the required 10,000 signatures to appear on the March 6 ballot. Failing to get on the ballot in Virginia, where Gingrich lives, underscores the difficulty first-time national candidates have in preparing for the long haul of a presidential campaign.
Romney's team, larger than those of most of his opponents, has paid close attention to filing requirements in each state. He will appear on the Virginia ballot along with Texas Rep. Ron Paul, who also has run a national campaign before.
Three other candidates — Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum and former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman — did not submit signatures before Virginia's deadline of 5 p.m. Thursday.
Gingrich's campaign attacked Virginia's primary system on Saturday, saying that "only a failed system" would disqualify Gingrich and other candidates and vowing to run a write-in campaign.
"Voters deserve the right to vote for any top contender, especially leading candidates," Gingrich campaign director Michael Krull said in a statement. "We will work with the Republican Party of Virginia to pursue an aggressive write-in campaign to make sure that all the voters of Virginia are able to vote for the candidate of their choice."
However, according to state law, "No write-in shall be permitted on ballots in primary elections."
"Virginia code prohibits write-ins in primaries. He can't do it," said Carl Tobias, a law professor at University of Richmond.
Virginia GOP spokesman Garren Shipley said in a statement that volunteers spent Friday validating signatures on petitions that Romney, Paul, Perry and Gingrich had submitted. "After verification, RPV has determined that Newt Gingrich did not submit required 10k signatures and has not qualified for the VA primary," the party announced early Saturday on its Twitter feed.
Gingrich already missed the deadline to appear on the ballot in Missouri's Feb. 7 primary, though he insists it doesn't matter because the state awards delegates based not on the primary but on a Republican caucus held in March.
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2011/12/23/national/a162428S21.DTL#ixzz1gthUJ9v5
Romney's team, larger than those of most of his opponents, has paid close attention to filing requirements in each state. He will appear on the Virginia ballot along with Texas Rep. Ron Paul, who also has run a national campaign before.
Three other candidates — Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum and former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman — did not submit signatures before Virginia's deadline of 5 p.m. Thursday.
Gingrich's campaign attacked Virginia's primary system on Saturday, saying that "only a failed system" would disqualify Gingrich and other candidates and vowing to run a write-in campaign.
"Voters deserve the right to vote for any top contender, especially leading candidates," Gingrich campaign director Michael Krull said in a statement. "We will work with the Republican Party of Virginia to pursue an aggressive write-in campaign to make sure that all the voters of Virginia are able to vote for the candidate of their choice."
However, according to state law, "No write-in shall be permitted on ballots in primary elections."
"Virginia code prohibits write-ins in primaries. He can't do it," said Carl Tobias, a law professor at University of Richmond.
Virginia GOP spokesman Garren Shipley said in a statement that volunteers spent Friday validating signatures on petitions that Romney, Paul, Perry and Gingrich had submitted. "After verification, RPV has determined that Newt Gingrich did not submit required 10k signatures and has not qualified for the VA primary," the party announced early Saturday on its Twitter feed.
Gingrich already missed the deadline to appear on the ballot in Missouri's Feb. 7 primary, though he insists it doesn't matter because the state awards delegates based not on the primary but on a Republican caucus held in March.
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2011/12/23/national/a162428S21.DTL#ixzz1gthUJ9v5
Vote Fraud: How it is done - NO LIBERTY DEFENDER CAN WIN UNTIL WE ADDRESS THIS!
NO THIRD PARTY CAN WIN UNTIL WE ADDRESS THIS!
PLEASE REPOST THIS!
YOU MAY HAVE TO COPY AND PASTE THESE URLS DUE TO BLOCKING
THIS MESSAGE IS BEING BLOCKED BY SOME ISPs. IF YOU FIND THIS, JUST SEND THIS URL:
THE SURVIVAL OF LIBERTY DEPENDS ON MAKING THIS INFORMATION KNOWN.
Here is actual recorded testimony, given under oath,
by Clinton Curtis who admits that he wrote the program for vote fraud:
This one is a satire:
Humor: Diebold Accidentally Leaks Results Of 2008 Election Early
This one is NOT a satire:
Watch this one if you do not watch anything else
Hacking Democracy - an amazing documentary on widespread vote fraud using electonic vote counting equipment
DOWN LOAD THIS NOW BEFORE IT DISAPPEARS.
THIS WAS NOT AVAILABLE WHEN BUSH WAS PRESIDENT.
Step One:
Falsify the "official" polls to make the fraudulent election believable.
The controlled media will not report polls that disprove the predetermined election results.
The controlled media will propagandize that any actually valid polls should be disregarded. This gets quite amusing sometimes. We even see pundits discrediting their own polls.
At the end of this message you will see an accumulation of polls that these pundits will ignore. These prove that the "official" representations of polls are patently false.
Step Two: Use rigged voting machines to produce election results that agree with the fraudulent polls.
DEMAND PAPER BALLOTS
They can fake some of the polls to make it look as though the elections are real. Then they can even rig the elections with the voting machines.
They are also embarassed by the fact that they cannot assemble a good sized crowd of supporters for New World Order favorites. This is especially important when Ron Paul DOES assemble a good sized crowd of supporters in the same town, at the same time. They have a big problem with requirements for petitions which only allow signatures from certified registered voters.
Diebold Accidentally Leaks Results Of 2008 Election Early
THE ABOVE IS A SATIRE.
THESE ARE NOT SATIRE:
EUGENE CLINTON CURTIS testifies before Ohio Election Commission.
Multiple URLs are provided due to the fact that these URLs are being blocked, censored and removed.
The media does not tell us what we beleive
or what we support.
We tell them.
Here are some of the polls that they will not show to you.
Who won the Republican Presidential Debate in Ames, Iowa 08/11/2011?
Thaddeus McCotter (7%, 71 Votes)
Michele Bachmann (3%, 25 Votes)
Herman Cain (1%, 12 Votes)
Mitt Romney (1%, 7 Votes)
Write-In (1%, 5 Votes)
Newt Gingrich (0%, 3 Votes)
Rick Santorum (0%, 2 Votes)
Tim Pawlenty (0%, 2 Votes)
Jon Huntsman (1%, 1 Votes)
Herman Cain 0.7% (8 votes)
ANOTHER POLL
RON PAUL IN FIRST PLACE WITH MORE THAT THREE TIMES THE NEXT CLOSEST
National Vote
Paul
25018
Gingrich
5853
Cain
3168
Bachmann
2423
Romney
2372
Santorum
1032
Huntsman
421
Pawlenty
332
Votes as of 08:33 AM, 08/14/11
National Vote
Paul
25018
Gingrich
5853
Cain
3168
Bachmann
2423
Romney
2372
Santorum
1032
Huntsman
421
Pawlenty
332
Votes as of 08:33 AM, 08/14/11
National Vote
| Paul |
|
25018 |
| Gingrich |
|
5853 |
| Cain |
|
3168 |
| Bachmann |
|
2423 |
| Romney |
|
2372 |
| Santorum |
|
1032 |
| Huntsman |
|
421 |
| Pawlenty |
|
332 |
***********OTHER GOP DEBATE POLLS*****************************************
FOX NEWS Think Progress
Ed Schultz Tea Party
Sean Hannity www.YPN.com
Bearing Drift MSNBC
Tenn Rep Party FOX NEWS Insider
Tea Party Patriots FOX NEWS
CNN Knox County 912
Worldmag.com the Blaze
Vortex Effect FOX NEWS FB
Red Dog Report www.vote.com
-------------------
Poll: Who won tonight's GOP debate?
Results with 224 short comments
Total of 11,558 votes - click on the "Display Comments" bar below to sort comments
Ron Paul
75.8%
(8,763 votes)
Michele Bachmann
7.2%
(837 votes)
Mitt Romney
6.3%
(727 votes)
Herman Cain
5.5%
(631 votes)
Newt Gingrich
2.4%
(273 votes)
Tim Pawlenty
1.9%
(216 votes)
Rick Santorum
Poll: Who won tonight's GOP debate?
Results with 224 short comments
Total of 11,558 votes - click on the "Display Comments" bar below to sort comments
| Ron Paul |
75.8%
(8,763 votes)
|
| Michele Bachmann |
7.2%
(837 votes)
|
| Mitt Romney |
6.3%
(727 votes)
|
| Herman Cain |
5.5%
(631 votes)
|
| Newt Gingrich |
2.4%
(273 votes)
|
| Tim Pawlenty |
1.9%
(216 votes)
|
| Rick Santorum |
----------------------------
http://bearingdrift.com/2011/08/10/bd-poll-who-will-win-the-ames-straw-poll/
Who will win the Ames Straw Poll?
Ron Paul (87%,, 819 Votes)
Who will win the Ames Straw Poll?
Ron Paul (87%,, 819 Votes)
---------------------------
|
Mitt Romney
65 votes
|
||
|
Michele Bachmann
35 votes
|
||
|
Rick Santorum
5 votes
|
||
|
Herman Cain
7 votes
|
||
|
Jon Huntsman
14 votes
|
||
|
Newt Gingrich
23 votes
|
||
|
Ron Paul
1,027 votes
|
|
|
|
Tim Pawlenty
1 vote
|
|
------------------
|
Michele Bachmann
2,712 votes
|
||
|
Herman Cain
1,158 votes
|
||
|
Newt Gingrich
1,529 votes
|
||
|
Jon Huntsman
29 votes
|
||
|
Ron Paul
4,205 votes
|
|
|
|
Tim Pawlenty
57 votes
|
||
|
Mitt Romney
296 votes
|
||
|
Rick Santorum
161 votes
|
|
-------------------
| Response Percent |
||
|---|---|---|
| Michele Bachmann |
 |
2.6% |
| Herman Cain |
|
2.4% |
| Newt Gingrich |
|
4.9% |
| Jon Huntsman |
|
0.4% |
| Ron Paul |
|
82.7% |
| Tim Pawlenty |
|
0.9% |
| Mitt Romney |
|
3.7% |
| Rick Santorum |
|
0.7% |
| None of the above |
------------------
http://vortexeffect.net/ (Poll now removed. Original votes are shown below)
Ron Paul 94.37% (1,072 votes)
Mitt Romney 3.7% (42 votes)
Newt Gingrich 0.7% (8 votes)
------------
|
Tim Pawlenty
20 votes
|
||
|
||
|
Rick Perry
46 votes
|
-------------------------
Ron Paul 80.03% (1,435 votes)
Sarah Palin 9.93% (178 votes)
Herman Cain 4.07% (73 votes)
------------------
MSNBC
http://politics.newsvine.com/_news/2011/08/11/7350500-who-do-you-think-won-the-gop-presidential-candidates-debate
http://politics.newsvine.com/_news/2011/08/11/7350500-who-do-you-think-won-the-gop-presidential-candidates-debate
Total of 28,266 votes -
| Ron Paul |
35.6%
(10,065 votes)
|
| There was no clear winner |
23.3%
(6,592 votes)
|
| Mitt Romney |
14.4%
(4,061 votes)
|
| Newt Gingrich |
7.6%
(2,138 votes)
|
| Michele Bachmann |
6.4%
(1,821 votes)
|
| Herman Cain |
4.5%
(1,262 votes)
|
| Jon Huntsman |
3.8%
(1,071 votes)
|
| Tim Pawlenty |
2.8%
(793 votes)
|
| Rick Santorum |
1.6%
(463 votes)
|
--------------------
FOX NEWS Insider
http://foxnewsinsider.com/2011/08/11/poll-who-do-you-think-came-out-on-top-of-the-iowa-republican-presidential-debate/#more-73865
http://foxnewsinsider.com/2011/08/11/poll-who-do-you-think-came-out-on-top-of-the-iowa-republican-presidential-debate/#more-73865
Create Your Own Poll
Surveydaddy
Check out Surveydaddy, the most easy-to-use survey software around. Start creating beautiful online surveys today.
Create an Online Survey
--------------------
FOX NEWS
Ron Paul 55.56% (9,550 votes)
Newt Gingrich 14.55% (2,501 votes)
Mitt Romney 10.36% (1,781 votes)
Michele Bachmann 7.02% (1,207 votes)
Herman Cain 6.78% (1,165 votes)
Rick Santorum 2.51% (431 votes)
Tim Pawlenty 1.76% (303 votes)
Jon Huntsman 1.46% (251 votes)
Ron Paul 55.56% (9,550 votes)
-------------------------------
Votes as of 08:58 AM, 08/12/11
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
Ron Paul Slides into Top Tier - Wins Debate by Telling Iowans -- and America -- the Truth
AMES, IOWA - August 11, 2011 - Thomas Woods - Once again, Ron Paul distinguished himself in a Republican presidential debate by telling Americans the truth, answering the questions he was asked, and refusing to treat his countrymen like ten-year-olds who should be spoken to in bumper-sticker slogans.
On the economy, everyone talked about lower taxes, cutting spending, and a balanced budget - the usual boilerplate. Only Ron Paul sought to explain why we have recessions in the first place. Only Ron Paul mentioned the critical role of the Federal Reserve System in blowing up the bubbles that have popped in America over the past decade. Only Ron Paul explained that the monetary system we have, whereby money can be created out of thin air whenever the political class wants it, is a recipe for the very kind of disaster we are living through right now.
To be sure, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich had some critical words for particular Fed policies, but surely his recent criticism of the Fed is one of the exceedingly rare times, if not the only time, he has made serious mention of the Federal Reserve in over three decades in public life.
The only reason any of them will even talk about the Fed is Ron Paul, who took the issue from the depths of obscurity and turned it into a live issue for the first time in the nearly one hundred years of the Fed's existence.
But where Congressman Paul really stood out, of course, was in foreign policy. He dismissed the comments of the neoconservative former U.S. Senator Rick Santorum as "war propaganda," which indeed Senator Santorum can be relied upon to parrot at every opportunity. He explained that the history of U.S. relations in Iran did not begin with the hostage crisis in 1979, as Senator Santorum tried to pretend. It began with the U.S./British coup in 1953 that brought the oppressive shah to power, and it was resentment over his police state that turned Iranians against the U.S. Before the U.S. government's interventions in the Middle East, Americans had an excellent reputation in that part of the world - another piece of history our political class ignores.
Our delicate ears are not supposed to hear the kinds of things Ron Paul told Americans tonight. We're supposed to hear "USA! USA!" We are supposed to be flattered, told our leaders have infallible judgment, and urged to believe that anyone who questions that judgment, or who thinks anyone around the world might have a legitimate grievance against the American political class, "hates America." Given how many grievances we Americans have with our political class, is it really so hard to imagine that other people might, too?
Everyone on the stage wanted to talk about budgets, but only Ron Paul pointed out that the wars are costing trillions of dollars, with a sixth war being seriously contemplated. This is pure insanity, and the only person who will level with the American people about it is Ron Paul.
It's hard to imagine one person being so consistently and thoroughly vindicated as Congressman Paul. On the economy in particular, he has been warning for decades about the certain outcome of our monetary system and economic policies. The world is now beginning to undergo the exact convulsions he predicted would result.
Ron Paul is the only person on that stage who has the slightest grasp of what is happening in America and around the world right now. All they can do is repeat GOP talking points. Ron Paul knows the economics and the history inside and out.
Dr. Paul, who is often too humble even to say "I," rarely points out in such a setting that he, along among the candidates on stage, had been so prophetic about all this. That is where Revolution PAC comes in. We're not humble at all. We intend to brag about Ron Paul like crazy. It is a scandal that Americans could even consider another candidate when a man of the intelligence and integrity of Ron Paul stands before them. He alone told us what was coming. He alone can point the way to a better future for America.
Dr. Paul's prophetic words about the economic breakdown we are living through may be the best kept secret in America. At Revolution PAC, we refuse to keep it that way. Please help us spread the message! http://revolutionpac.com/superbomb
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:Ron Paul Slides into Top Tier - Wins Debate by Telling Iowans -- and America -- the TruthAMES, IOWA - August 11, 2011 - Thomas Woods - Once again, Ron Paul distinguished himself in a Republican presidential debate by telling Americans the truth, answering the questions he was asked, and refusing to treat his countrymen like ten-year-olds who should be spoken to in bumper-sticker slogans.On the economy, everyone talked about lower taxes, cutting spending, and a balanced budget - the usual boilerplate. Only Ron Paul sought to explain why we have recessions in the first place. Only Ron Paul mentioned the critical role of the Federal Reserve System in blowing up the bubbles that have popped in America over the past decade. Only Ron Paul explained that the monetary system we have, whereby money can be created out of thin air whenever the political class wants it, is a recipe for the very kind of disaster we are living through right now.To be sure, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich had some critical words for particular Fed policies, but surely his recent criticism of the Fed is one of the exceedingly rare times, if not the only time, he has made serious mention of the Federal Reserve in over three decades in public life.The only reason any of them will even talk about the Fed is Ron Paul, who took the issue from the depths of obscurity and turned it into a live issue for the first time in the nearly one hundred years of the Fed's existence.But where Congressman Paul really stood out, of course, was in foreign policy. He dismissed the comments of the neoconservative former U.S. Senator Rick Santorum as "war propaganda," which indeed Senator Santorum can be relied upon to parrot at every opportunity. He explained that the history of U.S. relations in Iran did not begin with the hostage crisis in 1979, as Senator Santorum tried to pretend. It began with the U.S./British coup in 1953 that brought the oppressive shah to power, and it was resentment over his police state that turned Iranians against the U.S. Before the U.S. government's interventions in the Middle East, Americans had an excellent reputation in that part of the world - another piece of history our political class ignores.Our delicate ears are not supposed to hear the kinds of things Ron Paul told Americans tonight. We're supposed to hear "USA! USA!" We are supposed to be flattered, told our leaders have infallible judgment, and urged to believe that anyone who questions that judgment, or who thinks anyone around the world might have a legitimate grievance against the American political class, "hates America." Given how many grievances we Americans have with our political class, is it really so hard to imagine that other people might, too?Everyone on the stage wanted to talk about budgets, but only Ron Paul pointed out that the wars are costing trillions of dollars, with a sixth war being seriously contemplated. This is pure insanity, and the only person who will level with the American people about it is Ron Paul.It's hard to imagine one person being so consistently and thoroughly vindicated as Congressman Paul. On the economy in particular, he has been warning for decades about the certain outcome of our monetary system and economic policies. The world is now beginning to undergo the exact convulsions he predicted would result.Ron Paul is the only person on that stage who has the slightest grasp of what is happening in America and around the world right now. All they can do is repeat GOP talking points. Ron Paul knows the economics and the history inside and out.Dr. Paul, who is often too humble even to say "I," rarely points out in such a setting that he, along among the candidates on stage, had been so prophetic about all this. That is where Revolution PAC comes in. We're not humble at all. We intend to brag about Ron Paul like crazy. It is a scandal that Americans could even consider another candidate when a man of the intelligence and integrity of Ron Paul stands before them. He alone told us what was coming. He alone can point the way to a better future for America.Dr. Paul's prophetic words about the economic breakdown we are living through may be the best kept secret in America. At Revolution PAC, we refuse to keep it that way. Please help us spread the message! http://revolutionpac.com/superbomb
Corporate Media Attempts to Marginalize Ron Paul by Ignoring Him - Alex Jones Tv 1/2
Alex comments on the Ames Iowa straw polls results and media coverage of
Ron Paul --- From Alex Jones Show, Monday, August 15 2011.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQgyCxLtLns
Alex comments on the Ames Iowa straw polls results and media coverage of
Ron Paul --- From Alex Jones Show, Monday, August 15 2011.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQgyCxLtLns
Laugh so hard you will cry, then stand up and fight back.
This article is also posted at:
Please visit the ultimate resource for defending liberty.
CLICK HERE:
John Perna
To be removed from my address book,
Ron Paul buttons and bumper stickers:
CLICK HERE:
If you get a message that says "address is not valid" then copy and paste the address into the address bar.
This is the Most Extensive Collection of Freedom Videos Ever Compiled:
John Perna
My email is:
JPerna at sc.rr.com
which, if not censored, will show as:
Are you looking for a book about defending liberty?
Many rare and out of print books are still available.
Look here:
Then look here:
If you get a message that says "address is not valid"
then copy and paste the address into the address bar.
Please Watch these videos:
REAL EYE OPENERS. DOWN LOAD THEM NOW BEFORE THEY DISAPPEAR.
Invisible Empire - full version NWO video An absolutely amazing expose' of the power brokers of the world: No criminal tyrant left behind.
The American Dream - a very important video
http://tinyurl.com/USADream (NOT CLICKABLE)
or
or
-----------
One Video that says it ALL - the VERY BEST
Ron Paul: The Only One We Can Trust
------------
A Day In The Park - coming soon
------------
Ron Paul 2012 - Can you Hear us Now?
9/11: A Conspiracy Theory
------------
To be removed from my address book,
reply to this message with the word remove or unsubscribe in the subject line.
To be added to my address book,
reply to this message with the word add in the subject line.
Send this to JPerna at sc.rr.com
which, if not censored, will show as:
V ~ For Victory
Thrive - The Movie THAT WILL CHANGE THE COURSE OF HISTORY - NEW URLS NOT YET CENSORED
Ron Paul bumper sticker:
Ron Paul the Hope & Change You Wanted
10 pack of Ron Paul bumper stickers:
Ron Paul the Hope & Change You Wanted
===============
Ron Paul buttons:
Ron Paul the Hope & Change You Wanted
10 pack of 2.25″ metal, 2 color, buttons:
THE HONEST SUPPORT US.
THE HEROIC JOIN US.
HERE IS your Free DISCOUNT Card FOR Prescription, Lab and Imaging. UP TO 75% OFF
